Finding the Toilet in Stockholm
Last week a mix of water and sanitation experts gathered for World Water Week in Stockholm, Sweden to mull over the world's biggest public health crisis. The problem is that not enough people paid attention.
Last week a mix of water and sanitation experts gathered for World Water Week in Stockholm, Sweden to mull over the world's biggest public health crisis. The problem is that not enough people paid attention.
It's very easy for CNN to report on Warner Brothers and acknowledge their common corporate parent. What will Campbell Brown do when she reports on diplomacy with Iran?
The networks are furiously chattering about what might constitute a political misstep during the hurricane and, in a lucky turn, it's made both McCain and Obama act like civilized people.
Members of the military are speaking with their checkbooks, and reiterating just how strongly they believe we need to begin to redeploy from Iraq, and go on the offense against al Qaeda.
Last night at the RNC, President Bush argued that John McCain is ready to lead America in the 21st century, in part because he "understands the lesson...
Local newspapers have called the increasing civilian casualties, "huge crisis" as Afghans began dawn-to-dusk fasting on the first day of the holy month of Ramadan.
The Rand Corporation, a conservative think-tank originally started by the U.S. Air Force, has produced a new report entitled, "How Terrorist Groups En...
Like all years, this Democratic National Convention is touted as THE year that the Democrats will end that darn D.C. corruption and REALLY let the Rep...
"It's sad that 11 % of US voters wouldn't even consider voting for a woman but a majority would never vote for an atheist. Although 92% would vote for a Jew, the question of voting for a Muslim is not even asked!"
If McCain is serious about an indefinite commitment to Iraq, with no timetable for when the troops come home, then he doesn't have the troops to make any meaningful "surge" in Afghanistan.
The world is now run by a generation of leaders who have never known global war. Has this dulled their senses?
"We should have an election in which we have one candidate making the case for the global war on terror and an opponent making the case that the whole concept of global war as the response to violent Islamic radicalism is flawed."
I was on vacation last week in France when the Iranian government said yes to a request for an interview. I flew to Tehran and talked to the president in the garden outside his presidential office.
Once again there was our president, presiding over disasters in part of his making and on his watch, grinning with an aplomb that suggested a serious disconnect with existing reality.
I'm no Cokehead. I allow myself no more than two Diet Cokes per day (Diets mixed with Jack Daniels do not count). But I do drink a lot of Coca-Cola ...
The holidays are a tough time of year for our troops and their families back home, so we at IAVA came up with something pretty damn cool for them.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Ideology. There will always be conflict as long as social and religious differences are in place. No panacea will end the envy, the distrust, the disagreements, or the violence.
Obama will handle the issues of the world with it's inhabitants in mind, first and foremost, as McCain would seek short term capital gain over lives, human being's lives, in general. Just as Bush has done.
I am for everyone having a chance at living. I look at Obama and feel that at the very least, people's lives will come first. I look at McCain and see a Bush that has been denied his due for, in his mind, far too long- a very dangerous combination for a soldier or an innocent abroad. So McBush is not the choice for Humanity. Obama is.
Just my thoughts.
roflmao
If you can't beat them you gotta join them!!!
Pakistan has nukes... guess what the next push from the Bush people will be - you guessed it - we have to invade Pakistan so that we can "secure' the nukes...
War with Pakistan - Afghan - Iraq - seems our destiny is set to become a has been nation because brother we ain't got the power to invade Pakistan to keep those nukes out of terrorist hands.
Life is so sweet.
Is there any wonder why Bush is so loved.
A military under Obama would not kill civilians as indiscriminately when making minor incursions into Pakistan as under Bush. Avoiding civilian casualties would be greatly elevated in our policy under Obama.
The problem here is that al Qaida has declared war on Americans, has repeatedly said they would kill Americans, and in fact killed thousands of Americans on Sept. 11. They are clearly a threat. Perhaps a reduced one at this point, but we have witnessed what can happen when they are allowed to regroup and develop their plans.
The war on terror is a ridiculously general and ambiguous concept that has clearly been abused. And we should be as specific as possible about who it is we are fighting. But whether you want to call it a war or some other type of pursuit against criminals, we are currently engaged in conflict with al Qaida. And I would expect either Obama or McCain to vigorously pursue them.
Obama never said he would not work with other nations in pursuit of al Qaida and the Taliban. Just the opposite, in fact. He was responding to a specific question about a specific hypothetical situation involving terrorists that meet specific criteria.
I believe U.S. attacks on the Pakistan frontier happened well before any Obama pronouncement, in fact I'm sure of it. It has always been U.S. policy.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in