Unbelievable. Rosie O'Donnell actually quit The View, three weeks before her contract was up, like a big, blubbery baby. Seriously.
There are huge ironies here, but the first one that struck us was that she left after her showdown with Elisabeth Hasselbeck, aka the "Poor Little Elisabeth" O'Donnell claimed to have been forced to go easy on lest she be perceived as a bully.
Except, of course, that that is exactly what Rosie O'Donnell is: a huge bully. The exchange on
The View
was a stunning display of that, from beginning to end. For those who only caught the highlight clip (starting with Rosie saying in a soft, menacing tone: "Do you think I think the troops are terrorists, Elisabeth? Yes or no?" and then graduating to a "
"-style "YES...OR...NO?"), the entire clip is telling (we've got it below, courtesy of YouTube). It is incredible TV, no question — but, wow, is it ever revealing about Rosie, who starts off on the attack, eyes narrowed, trying to nail Hasselbeck on a semantic point and then feinting back into the victim pose,
sulking that everyone paints her as "Big Fat Lesbian Loud Rosie Attacks Innocent Pure Christian Elisabeth," which, in point of fact, may not be entirely incorrect, but is one hell of a generalization to fall back on after failing to stick someone on a point. A more accurate depiction might be "Rosie Attacks" — because that's what Rosie does best, and she's done a great job of it on
The View
, but yeah, she's certainly done it loudly and she's certainly wielded her moderator's chair like a blunt cudgel, swung with force more than facts.
Bullies never like it when the tables are turned, and Rosie was no different; it is instructive, I think, to note that Rosie's pouting complaint about Elisabeth was that she didn't stick up for her or come to her defense — the exact same grievance she had against Barbara Walters in their feud. A careful watching of the argument reveals that it's not at all about the substance of Rosie's comments — and specifically, her implication that the U.S. and/or the troops in Iraq were akin to terrorists — instead it was about how Elisabeth failed to stand up for Rosie and how Rosie failed to clarify her statements at Elisabeth's suggestion. This fight was not about the war in Iraq (despite Joy Behar's best efforts) — it was 100% about Rosie's nose being out of joint, and about her ability to dish it out but not take it.
For those who are not fans of Hasselbeck — like Donald Trump — well, fair enough: She supports a stupid, terrible war and I don't agree with most of what she says, but one thing I will say about her is that I respect her willingness to engage on the issues, honestly, and pretty bravely considering the unpopularity of her viewpoint. But that is beside the point here, anyway: This fight was not about politics, it was about what Rosie thought Elisabeth should have said about her politics or something, but which really meant Rosie's ego.
It is ego that drove Rosie to quit three weeks before the expiration of her contract, ego that impelled her to pout in non-rhyming free verse on her blog, posting a self-pitying video and affecting a put-upon air. This is the same woman who took a week to apologize for the "ching chong" comment. And now she's walking three weeks early, because she picked a fight with an easy mark — and lost? Wow. From bully to baby in 0.5 seconds. But it's not an arc that should be surprising, really, because this seems to be how Rosie rolls — start out as the Queen of Nice, end up hurling accusations and parting bitterly. Even so, she's a professional, or should be — and with three weeks left to go, a professional stays in the hot seat she's been given the freedom all year to create, and sees it through — at the very least for the sake of the fans who have supported her through each controversy, not to mention the spirit behind the show that gave her yet another chance at the spotlight. Then again, it is called The View; I guess when that view stopped being Rosie's, it was time to go.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.